Manchester suicide bombing. Let’s talk honestly. 

Officials, ministers, celebrities and dignitaries have expressed their disgust at the nailbomb attack that has killed 22 and wounded more than 50 people, many still in hospital. They’ve all condemned it, and many have said something along the lines of “praying for the victims”, “a cowardly attack on innocent people”, or “we stand united.” 

Alright, so we’ve got the meaningless nonsense out of the way, now we can talk honestly. 

The 7/7 attack on Britain wasn’t bad enough for British politicians to significantly change their views. That is, to really crack down on groups that have at their aim both non-violent street preaching calling for Britain to become a totalitarian theocracy, as well as violent attacks both within their own communities as well as on the general populace. And on that day 52 people were killed and more than 784 injured. So there’s a pretty good chance that absolutely nothing will change after what happened at the Arena. 

The UK government doesn’t seem to have a strategy to end this violent ideological war. Mosques generally expel those who preach violence. But as long as they allow speakers to preach very harsh intolerance and sometimes hate towards certain Western norms and express Islam as something separate from the West creating an underlying current of Us versus Them, at a theological level, then the seeds for those eager to use violence and their justifications will have already been sown. 

The UK government should use its powers to crack down on these outlaw groups that mosques have expelled. With a new enemy to fight, the government should review its tactics thoroughly, learning from similar events both in recent and ancient history. Particularly looking at Islamic extremism abroad, for example in Egypt. These outlaws abuse freedom of speech to gain recruits for their aim of theocratic government. Violence is an acceptable means for them. 

Unfortunatly I don’t think that the UK government will tackle the issue because it is still plagued, as are all European nations, by the scars of the Second World War. They see a harsh crackdown on Islamic centres or groups that have been rejected by mosques as either an infringement on religious freedoms and human rights of Muslims or an action that could legitimise the claims of a small British undercurrent (think EDL) which they fear will lead to violence towards Muslims. 

I can only say that right now there is still a good chance to implement policies that solve the issues at hand. And most importantly, if explained well there will be support for it. 

What I fear most is that extremist groups will grow stronger, and that the soft and innefective measures that we have now will irritate Muslims who have nothing to do with these groups while the rest of society gets deeper suspicions and maybe hatred of Muslims because the government can’t stop violent attacks. The combination of which will inevitably breed more violence, worse than we are experiencing now.


I’m thinking about making YouTube video’s on various topics. I generally just like to respond to nonsense. 

What do you guys think? Should I? And which topics? 

Leave your comments down below if you have any ideas 🙂 


“The sleep of reason creates monsters.”

Is the title of this painting by Francisco Goya made around 1799. 

It’s thought provoking. What happens when we give up our critical faculties?

The official motivation for the painting is as follows:

“Goya imagines himself asleep amidst his drawing tools, his reason dulled by slumber and bedeviled by creatures that prowl in the dark. The work includes owls that may be symbols of folly and bats symbolizing ignorance. The artist’s nightmare reflected his view of Spanish society, which he portrayed in the Caprichos as demented, corrupt, and ripe for ridicule.”